Smart Immigration Lawyer

  • About Me
  • My Services
  • Free Consultation
  • Our Offices
  • Blog
  • Client Reviews
  • Fiance Visa
    • Introduction to the K-1 Fiance Visa
    • Legal Requirements for the K-1 Fiance Visa
    • How Much It Costs
    • Why Hire Me
    • How You Can Get Started
  • Spouse Visa
    • Introduction to the Spouse Visa
    • Legal Requirements of the Spouse Visa
    • How Much It Costs
    • Why Hire Me
    • How You Can Get Started
  • Adjustment of Status
    • Introduction to Adjustment of Status
    • Legal Requirements for Adjustment of Status
    • How Much It Costs
    • Why Hire Me
    • How You Can Get Started
  • I-601 Waiver
    • Introduction to the I-601 Waiver
    • Legal Requirements of the I-601 Waiver
    • What is Extreme Hardship
    • How Much It Costs
    • Why Hire Me
    • How You Can Get Started
  • I-212 Waiver
    • Introduction to the I-212 Waiver
    • Legal Requirements of the I-212 Waiver
    • How Much It Costs
    • Why Hire Me
    • How You Can Get Started
    • I-212 Filing Locations
  • I-601A Provisional Waiver
    • Introduction to the I-601A Provisional Waiver
    • Legal Requirements of the I-601A Provisional Waiver
    • What is Extreme Hardship
    • I-601A Provisional Waiver Fee & Cost
    • Why Hire Me for the I-601A Provisional Waiver
    • How You Can Get Started on the I-601A Provisional Waiver
  • 212(d)(3) General Waiver
  • 212(h) Waiver for Crimes
  • Inadmissibility and Waivers Chart

I-601 Waiver Approved by Waiver Attorney Michael Cho

July 25, 2013 By Michael Cho Immigration Lawyer Leave a Comment

I-601 Waiver Approved

We received approval of a client’s immigrant visa petition and I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility.  Our office  prepared and filed the I-130 petition, secured its approval, then put together a comprehensive I-601 waiver package that was submitted to the USCIS for adjudication.  The I-601 waiver was approved and our client obtained his immigrant visa at the U.S. consulate in Ciudad Juarez before returning to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident.

Our client was a native of Mexico who entered the U.S. without inspection over 11 years ago.  He subsequently married a U.S. citizen and they had a daughter together.  He required the I-601 Application of Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility due to his unlawful presence of over 1 year inside the United States, which made him subject to the 10 year unlawful presence bar under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B).

An I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility requires a showing that the applicant’s U.S. citizen spouse or parent would suffer “extreme hardship” if the applicant is refused admission into the United States.  “Extreme hardship” has a special meaning under U.S. immigration law.  The factors considered relevant in determining extreme hardship include:

  • Health of the qualifying relative: ongoing or specialized treatment requirements for a physical or mental condition; availability and quality of such treatment in the foreign national’s country, anticipated duration of the treatment; whether a condition is chronic or acute, or long or short-term.
  • Financial considerations: future employability; loss due to sale of home or business or termination of a professional practice; decline in standard of living; ability to recoup short-term losses; cost of extraordinary needs, such as special education or training for children; cost of caring for family members (i.e., elderly and infirm parents).
  • Education: loss of opportunity for higher education; lower quality or limited scope of education options; disruption of current program; requirement to be educated in a foreign language or culture with ensuing loss of time in grade; availability of special requirements, such as training programs or internships in specific fields.
  • Personal considerations: close relatives in the United States and/or the foreign national’s country; separation from spouse/children; ages of involved parties; length of residence and community ties in the United States.
  • Special considerations: cultural, language, religious, and ethnic obstacles; valid fears of persecution, physical harm, or injury; social ostracism or stigma; access to social institutions or structures.
  • Any other information that explains how your personal circumstances may qualify as imposing extreme hardship on a qualifying U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident relative.

Spouses must demonstrate that their relationship will suffer more than the normal hardship or financial inconvenience caused by family separation.

In support of his I-601 waiver application, I prepared a comprehensive legal brief going over how the facts and circumstances of his situation met the legal standards used to define “extreme hardship.”  This brief was accompanied by supporting exhibits that provided proof of the statements made in the legal brief.

Factors in the favor of our client were the following:

  • Our client had no criminal record and was a law-abiding individual his entire life except for the immigration mistake he made to enter and live illegally inside the U.S.
  • His U.S. citizen wife had suffered from severe kidney and bladder infections her entire life.  We obtained a letter from her physician confirming her chronic condition and recommending regular check-ups and treatment inside the United States
  • Their daughter had been diagnosed with jaundice.  We obtained a letter from her physician confirming her illness and recommending regular check-ups inside the United States.
  • We provided a report of the Mexican health system and demonstrated that the U.S. citizen wife and daughter would not be able to receive reliable and adequate medical care for their conditions in rural Mexico where the Mexican husband was from.
  • The U.S. citizen wife and child received medical care in the United States through health insurance provided by the Mexican husband’s employment in the United States.  Without his presence and employment in the U.S., they would lose their medical coverage.  On the other hand, moving to Mexico would also mean no longer being able to obtain medical treatments since she could not afford private health insurance given their pre-existing conditions.
  • Our client was a devoted husband and father who took care of his U.S. citizen wife and child on a daily basis and worked hard to pay for their rent, food, and other living expenses.  They would suffer financial hardship without his presence given their health problems and the U.S. citizen wife serving as the primary care-giver for their young daughter.
  • We submitted a psychological report which diagnosed the U.S. citizen wife with Clinical Anxiety Disorder.  We showed the interrelationship between psychological and physical disease, and presented evidence to show that her condition would worsen without the presence of her husband together with her in the United States.

As a result of the I-601 waiver approval, this family now lives inside the United States as lawful, contributing citizens of the United States.

Filed Under: Blog, Extreme Hardship, I-601 Waivers, Spouse Visa, Unlawful Presence, Waiver Approvals

Defining Extreme Hardship in I-601 Waiver Cases

July 17, 2013 By Michael Cho Immigration Lawyer Leave a Comment

Michael Cho Immigration Lawyer

According to Section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration & Nationality Act, an alien unlawfully present in the United States for one year or more who again seeks admission to the U.S. within 10 years of the date of alien’s departure or removal from the U.S. is inadmissible.

However, Section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act provides for a waiver of section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) inadmissibility if the inadmissible alien can establish that refusal of admission would result in extreme hardship to the U.S. citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of the alien.  This is also referred to as the I-601 waiver, or the I-601 “extreme hardship” waiver.

Extreme hardship is “not a definable term of fixed and inflexible content or meaning, but necessarily depends upon the facts and circumstances peculiar to each case.” Matter of Hwang,10 I&N Dec. 448, 451 (BIA 1964 ).  In Matter of Cervantes-Gonzalez, the Board provided a list of factors it deemed relevant in determining whether an alien has established extreme hardship to a qualifying relative. 22 I&N Dec. 560, 565 (BIA 1999).  The factors include:

  • the presence of a lawful permanent resident or United States citizen spouse or parent in this country;
  • the qualifying family ties outside the United States;
  • the conditions in the country or countries to which the qualifying relative would relocate and the extent of the qualifying relative’s ties in such countries;
  • the financial impact of departure from this country;
  • and significant conditions of health, particularly when tied to an unavailability of suitable medical care in the country to which the qualifying relative would relocate

The Board added that not all of the foregoing factors need be analyzed in any given case and emphasized that the list of factors was not exclusive.

The Board has also held that the common or typical results of removal and inadmissibility do not constitute extreme hardship, and has listed certain individual hardship factors considered common rather than extreme. These factors include:

  • economic disadvantage
  • loss of current employment
  • inability to maintain one’s present standard of living
  • inability to pursue a chosen profession
  • separation from family members
  • severing community ties
  • cultural readjustment after living in the United States for many years
  • cultural adjustment of qualifying relatives who have never lived outside the United States
  • inferior economic and educational opportunities in the foreign country, or
  • inferior medical facilities in the foreign country

See generally Matter of Cervantes-Gonzalez. 22 I&N Dec. at 568; Matter of Pilch, 21 I&N Dec. 627, 632-33 (BIA 1996); Matter of Ige, 20 I&N Dec. 880, 883 (BIA 1994); Matter of Ngai, 19 I&N Dec. 245, 246-47 (Comm’r 1984); Matter of Kim, 15 I&N Dec. 88, 89-90 (BIA 1974); Matter of Shaughnessy, 12 I&N Dec. 810, 813 (BIA 1968).

However, though hardships may not be extreme when considered abstractly or individually, the Board has made it clear that “relevant factors, though not extreme in themselves must be considered in the aggregate in determining whether extreme hardship exists.” Matter of O-J-O, 21 I&N Dec. 381, 383 (BIA 1996) (quoting Matter of Ige, 20 I&N Dec. at 882).  The adjudicator “must consider the entire range of factors concerning hardship in their totality and determine whether the combination of hardships takes the case beyond those hardships ordinarily associated with deportation.”

The actual hardship associated with an abstract hardship factor such as family separation, economic disadvantage, cultural readjustment, et cetera, differs in nature and severity depending on the unique circumstances of each case, as does the cumulative hardship a qualifying relative experiences as a result of aggregated individual hardships.  See, e.g., Matter of Bing Chih Kau and Aiei Tsui Un, 23 I&N Dec. 45, 51 (BIA 2001) (distinguishing Matter of Pilch regarding hardship faced by qualifying relatives on the basis of variations in the length of residence in the United States and the ability to speak the language of the country to which they would relocate)

For example, though family separation has been found to be a common result of inadmissibility or removal, separation from family living in the United States can also be the most important single hardship factor in considering hardship in the aggregate. See Salcido-Salcido, 138 F.3d at 1293 ( quoting Contreras-Buenfil v. INS, 712 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1983)); but see Matter of Ngai, 19 I&N Dec. at 247 (separation of spouse and children from applicant not extreme hardship due to conflicting evidence in the record and because applicant and spouse had been voluntarily separated from one another for 28 years).

Therefore, when adjudicating I-601 waivers, it is the totality of the circumstances that will determine whether denial of admission would result in extreme hardship to a qualifying relative.

Filed Under: Blog, Extreme Hardship, I-601 Waivers, I-601A Provisional Waiver

I-601 Waiver Approved by Waiver Lawyer Michael Cho

July 6, 2013 By Michael Cho Immigration Lawyer Leave a Comment

Michael S Cho Immigration Lawyer

We received approval of a client’s I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility  just 4 months after it was prepared and filed by my office.  This was a particularly challenging case because the U.S. citizen husband was already residing in Ecuador with his wife and son for the past several years.

Our client was a native of Ecuador who used false immigration documents provided by others to enter the U.S over 14 years ago.   She remained in the United States illegally for over 10 years before departing voluntarily back to her home country of Ecuador with her U.S. citizen husband.  She required the I-601 Application of Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility due to her unlawful presence of over 1 year inside the United States, which made her subject to the 10 year unlawful presence bar under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B).  She was also subject to the fraud/misrepresentation ground of inadmissibility under INA Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) due to the use of a false document to enter the United States.

An I-601 Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility requires a showing that the applicant’s U.S. citizen spouse or parent would suffer “extreme hardship” if the applicant is refused admission into the United States.  “Extreme hardship” has a special meaning under U.S. immigration law.  The factors considered relevant in determining extreme hardship include:

  • Health of the qualifying relative: ongoing or specialized treatment requirements for a physical or mental condition; availability and quality of such treatment in the foreign national’s country, anticipated duration of the treatment; whether a condition is chronic or acute, or long or short-term.
  • Financial considerations: future employability; loss due to sale of home or business or termination of a professional practice; decline in standard of living; ability to recoup short-term losses; cost of extraordinary needs, such as special education or training for children; cost of caring for family members (i.e., elderly and infirm parents).
  • Education: loss of opportunity for higher education; lower quality or limited scope of education options; disruption of current program; requirement to be educated in a foreign language or culture with ensuing loss of time in grade; availability of special requirements, such as training programs or internships in specific fields.
  • Personal considerations: close relatives in the United States and/or the foreign national’s country; separation from spouse/children; ages of involved parties; length of residence and community ties in the United States.
  • Special considerations: cultural, language, religious, and ethnic obstacles; valid fears of persecution, physical harm, or injury; social ostracism or stigma; access to social institutions or structures.
  • Any other information that explains how your personal circumstances may qualify as imposing extreme hardship on a qualifying U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident relative.

Spouses must demonstrate that their relationship will suffer more than the normal hardship or financial inconvenience caused by family separation.

In support of her I-601 waiver application, I prepared a comprehensive legal brief going over how the facts and circumstances of her situation met the legal standards used to define “extreme hardship.”  This brief was accompanied by supporting exhibits that provided proof of the statements made in the legal brief.  This case was particularly difficult given that the U.S. citizen husband was already living abroad in Ecuador with his wife.  Proving extreme hardship was thus challenging since the USCIS could argue that the couple living together outside the U.S. for several years shows that the U.S. citizen is not suffering any extreme hardship.

Factors in the favor of our client were the following:

  • Our client had no criminal record and was a law-abiding individual her entire life except for the immigration mistakes she made to enter and live illegally inside the U.S.
  • Her U.S. citizen husband was suffering from a variety of medical problems while residing in Ecuador.  We obtained medical records and a letter from his Ecuadorian physician providing a comprehensive diagnosis and recommending further testing and treatment in the United States
  • Her U.S. citizen husband had to pay privately for medical care in Ecuador while on a fixed Social Security income.  This was shown to cause financial hardship.  On the other hand, his medical care would be paid for by Medicare if he was able to return to the United States.
  • He could not return to the United States without his wife and young son, since he relied upon his wife to take care of him on a daily basis.
  • Our client was a devoted wife and mother (of their 5 year old son) who took care of her U.S. citizen husband regularly and helped him cope with his medical problems.
  • We submitted a psychological report which diagnosed our client’s U.S. citizen husband with Clinical Anxiety Disorder.  We showed the interrelationship between psychological and physical disease, and presented evidence to show that his condition would worsen without the presence of his family together with him back in the United States.

As a result of the I-601 waiver approval, this family now lives back in the United States.  The U.S. citizen husband is able to receive the affordable medical care he requires to stay healthy through Medicare.

Filed Under: Blog, Fraud, I-601 Waivers, Waiver Approvals

USCIS Lockbox Filing Tip

June 23, 2013 By Michael Cho Immigration Lawyer Leave a Comment

Michael S Cho Immigration Lawyer

The USCIS Lockbox Facilities where immigration petitions are filed advises that exhibit tabs used by applicants are discarded before the filing reaches an officer for adjudication.  Additionally, colored page dividers are sometimes moved to the back of the filing before the file reaches an officer for adjudication.

If exhibits are critical to the petition, such as EB-1 cases or waivers, the lockbox recommends that applicants annotate each page of their supporting documentation with the exhibit number and page number at the bottom of the page (for example “Exhibit #, Page # of #”).

This helps ensure that adjudicating officer can easily refer to the appropriate documents and pages outlined in the petition. In addition, it may be helpful to cross reference the exhibits in the employer support letter, attorney brief, or other similar submissions. A master “Exhibit List” may also be helpful in organizing petitions with extensive supporting documentation.

Filed Under: Adjustment of Status, Blog, Fiance Visa, I-212 Waivers, I-601 Waivers, Spouse Visa, USCIS Filing Tips

« Previous Page

Get Started Today

You may request a Free Immigration Consultation.

If you would like to speak with me immediately to begin a case with our firm today, please call 323.238.4620.

Check Out Our Client Reviews

Read what people like you are saying about us on Facebook in our Client Testimonials.

Recent Posts

  • I-601 Waiver for Fraud/Misrepresentation Approved, Inadmissibility for Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude Removed, after Successful Writ of Mandamus Federal Lawsuit
  • I-601 and I-212 Waivers Approved for U.S. Citizen Spouse and Mexican Spouse currently residing outside the United States
  • 212(d)(3) Non-Immigrant Waiver Approved for B-1/B-2 Visa Applicant Charged with Fraud/Misrepresentation and Conviction of Crimes involving Moral Turpitude
  • I-601 Waiver Pursuant to INA 212(h)(1)(A) and INA 212(h)(1)(B) Approved for Israeli Applicant Charged with Crimes involving Moral Turpitude
  • I-601 Waiver for Crime Involving Moral Turpitude Approved for K-1 Fiance

Blog Posts on Waivers

  • 212 Waiver News
  • 212(a)(2)(A)
  • 212(a)(2)(D)
  • 212(a)(3)(D)
  • 212(a)(6)(8)
  • 212(a)(6)(C)(i)
  • 212(a)(9)(A)(i)
  • 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I)
  • 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II)
  • 212(a)(9)(B)(v)
  • 212(a)(D)(iv)
  • 212(d)(3) Waivers
  • 212(g) Waiver
  • 212(h) Waiver
  • 212(i) Waiver
  • 601 Waiver News
  • Adjustment of Status
  • B-1 Business Visa
  • Colombia
  • Communist Party Membership
  • Controlled Substance Violation
  • Crime of Moral Turpitude
  • Criminal Admissions
  • Criminal Convictions
  • Discretion
  • Drug Conviction
  • DUI – Driving under the Influence
  • E-2 Treaty Investor
  • Entered Without Inspection
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Exceptional or Extremely Unusual Hardship
  • Expedited Approval
  • Expedited Removal
  • Extreme Hardship
  • Fiance Visa
  • Fiance Visa Approvals
  • Fraud
  • Health-related Ground of Inadmissibility
  • Humanitarian Parole
  • I-192 Waivers
  • I-212 Waivers
  • I-601 Appeal with AAO
  • I-601 Waivers
  • I-601A Provisional Waiver
  • IMBRA Waiver
  • Immigrant Intent
  • Inadmissibility
  • India
  • Israel
  • Marijuana
  • Misrepresentation
  • Nicaragua
  • Overstay
  • Petty Offense Exception
  • Physical or Mental Health Disorder Inadmissibility
  • Previous Removal
  • Prosecutorial Discretion
  • Prostitution
  • Removal Proceedings
  • Request for Evidence (RFE)
  • Romania
  • Spouse Visa
  • Turkey
  • Unlawful Presence
  • Violent or Dangerous Crimes
  • Waiver Approvals
  • Writ of Mandamus

Search

Get Answers Now

You may request a Free Immigration Consultation.

Check Out Our Client Reviews

Read what people like you are saying about us on Facebook in our Client Testimonials.

Recent Posts

  • I-601 Waiver for Fraud/Misrepresentation Approved, Inadmissibility for Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude Removed, after Successful Writ of Mandamus Federal Lawsuit
  • I-601 and I-212 Waivers Approved for U.S. Citizen Spouse and Mexican Spouse currently residing outside the United States
  • 212(d)(3) Non-Immigrant Waiver Approved for B-1/B-2 Visa Applicant Charged with Fraud/Misrepresentation and Conviction of Crimes involving Moral Turpitude
  • I-601 Waiver Pursuant to INA 212(h)(1)(A) and INA 212(h)(1)(B) Approved for Israeli Applicant Charged with Crimes involving Moral Turpitude
  • I-601 Waiver for Crime Involving Moral Turpitude Approved for K-1 Fiance
FacebookLinkedInTwitter
American Immigration Lawyers Association Los Angeles County Bar Association State Bar of California University of Chicago Law School

Copyright © 2025 Smart Immigration Lawyer. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy